“By their fruits shall ye know them.” -Jesus from Matthew 7:1
It is often challenging to determine the operational principles of a powerful entity, especially when revealing those principles undermines the very objectives the organization aims to achieve. Simply put, if an organization tells you its rules, it risks neutralizing its own effectiveness.
The only reliable way to discern an entity’s motives is by analyzing its outputs. In the case of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), one must scrutinize their reportage on major issues, identify recurring patterns, and assess whether the reporting aligns with hidden agendas. This approach allows us to infer the underlying rules driving their actions and to question why such rules remain undisclosed.
From there, one can explore why these rules exist and why the organization cannot openly disclose them.
Two Case Studies: Rotherham and the Islamic State
The Rotherham Report (2014)
The BBC aired a report in 2014 about the industrial-scale child-sex-slave gangs in Rotherham. These gangs were predominantly composed of Muslims, nearly all of Pakistani origin, targeting white British girls. The report, however, conspicuously avoided mentioning the Islamic faith of the perpetrators. While the coverage, to a small degree, acknowledged the scale of the abuse, it grossly underestimated the number of victims and omitted the ideological or cultural context behind these crimes.
The Islamic State Report (2015)
In 2015, the BBC reported on the Islamic State’s demand for families to turn over individuals accused of homosexuality for execution. A particularly telling moment in this report was the statement from a father who claimed he would surrender his son if the accusation were true. This reaction, driven explicitly by the father’s adherence to Islamic doctrine, highlights the religious justification and ideological roots behind such actions. Yet the report framed this brutality as specific to the Islamic State, avoiding any broader critique of Islam’s teachings on homosexuality.
From these two examples, a pattern emerges:
- Homosexuality and Islam: The BBC’s report on the Islamic State highlighted the persecution of homosexuals but limited the scope to ISIS, refraining from addressing the broader, systemic oppression of homosexuals in many Muslim-majority countries. The timing of this report coincided with the United Kingdom’s military campaign against ISIS, suggesting that the coverage served a propagandistic purpose rather than a genuine critique of Islamic doctrine.
- Child Sexual Exploitation and Islam: In contrast, the BBC’s coverage of the Rotherham child-sex slave gangs avoided mentioning the Islamic faith of the perpetrators, focusing instead on the crimes in isolation. This omission sanitized the ideological motivations behind the atrocities, effectively shielding Islam and its adherents from scrutiny.
The disparity in these two approaches is very clear. When it suits the BBC’s agenda, as in the case of the Islamic State, they will highlight the issue of Islamic brutality, albeit selectively. However, when crimes such as child sexual exploitation implicate broader Islamic communities, the reporting becomes evasive and incomplete.
The Broader Implications
The Rotherham report’s omissions are particularly insidious because they present a veneer of honesty while concealing critical facts. The crimes in Rotherham—the industrial-scale sexual enslavement of non-Muslim white girls—echo the barbarity of the Islamic Barbary Pirates who raided European coastal villages for slaves in centuries past. Yet, modern discourse avoids drawing these historical parallels or addressing the ideological continuities.
Recent discussions in the UK Parliament have revisited the Rotherham scandal, questioning why the identities and motivations of the perpetrators were suppressed. The predictable response has been that such disclosures would unfairly stigmatize Muslims not involved in the crimes. But this logic collapses under scrutiny. If shielding innocents from collective blame is the priority, why does the BBC so readily vilify counter-revolutionary groups like the English Defence League (EDL) or the so-called “Far Right” without nuance or restraint?
Imagine the absurdity of the BBC refusing to label a Nazi in uniform as a Nazi to avoid implicating all Nazis in the Holocaust. Yet, when it comes to Islam, what we see is a new standard, not a double standard. The new standard of using carefully formalized and codified language selectively to achieve political outcomes at the expense of the truth and of a level playing field for all.
Dismantling Western Culture
This is not hypocrisy. It is the deliberate and tactical deployment of rhetorical weaponry aimed at dismantling Western culture and values. Islam is wielded as a tool in this broader agenda, with entities like the BBC serving as a rhetorical howitzer, firing narrative attacks at the public night and day. By protecting Islam from criticism, even when its adherents commit heinous crimes, the BBC trades in its reputation as a news agency. It takes on the role of the most pernicious form of Hegelian dialectical propaganda.
News Link: https://rairfoundation.com/bbcs-reporting-rules-whitewashing-islamic-atrocities-against-non/
